5 questions with Taryn Hanrahan of Fairfield and Woods

This week’s 5Q features Taryn F. Hanrahan, an associate at Fairfield and Woods in Denver. Hanrahan represents clients in complex civil litigation involving business and commercial disputes. Her experience includes motion practice, discovery and trial and appellate briefing. Previously, she clerked for New Mexico Supreme Court Justice David K. Thomson, working on civil, criminal and regulatory matters. She earned her law degree from Case Western Reserve University School of Law and her bachelor’s degree from Ohio University. Hanrahan is admitted to practice in Colorado, New Mexico and several federal courts, including the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

 


Question 1: Why did you become a lawyer/attorney?

Hanrahan: I participated in mock trial in high school and undergrad and realized that I enjoyed using the facts and the law to create a story. I liked the challenge of taking a set of facts, identifying what matters, and building a compelling argument. That combination of analytical thinking and storytelling is something I still enjoy about practicing law today.

 

Question 2: What’s something you know now that you wish you’d known when you began practicing?

Hanrahan: You won’t suddenly just have everything figured out one day, so enjoy the process of learning and always ask questions. Early in your career, it can feel like you’re supposed to know all the answers, but some of the best learning comes from asking questions, seeking advice, and being willing to admit when you don’t know something. Developing as an attorney is an ongoing process, and I think there’s value in embracing that rather than feeling like you need to have everything figured out.

 

Question 3: What’s one case or moment that shaped your career?

Hanrahan: I had the opportunity to clerk for Justice David K. Thomson of the New Mexico Supreme Court at the beginning of my career, which has shaped not only my writing but my analytical process in every case. The experience taught me the importance of looking beyond the immediate arguments to understand the underlying legal principles and how a decision fits into the broader legal framework.

 

Question 4: What does “justice” mean to you?

Hanrahan: To me, justice means making sure that everyone has a fair chance to be heard and that no one is judged before they have had the

opportunity to tell their side of the story.

 

Question 5: If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you be doing in Colorado?

Hanrahan: I would own a quilt shop or a coffee shop. I love the idea of having a space where people can slow down, be creative, and connect with others.

 

Previous articleColorado Supreme Court holds Umbrella/Excess Insurer is not required to “Drop Down” and provide First-Dollar coverage when Primary Insurer becomes insolvent
Next articleDenver prepares for potential federal presence at polling places

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here